Dog Lovers Don't Eat Dogs Animal Lovers Don't Eat Animals Shirt

Dog Lovers Don’t Eat Dogs Animal Lovers Don’t Eat Animals Shirt

SKU: VIETNAM-159662 Category: Tags: , , , ,

✅ Printed in the USA

✅ High-quality

✅ Order at amazon.com

Last day to order !

Shipping Info

  • Order now for holiday with DHL shipping.
  • Tip: Buying 2 products or more at the same time will save you quite a lot on shipping fees.

Dog Lovers Don't Eat Dogs Animal Lovers Don't Eat Animals Shirt

 BUY THIS PRODUCTS FROM AMAZON.COM HERE

Dog Lovers Don’t Eat Dogs Animal Lovers Don’t Eat Animals Shirt

✅ Printed in the USA

✅ High-quality

✅ Order at amazon.com

Dog Lovers Don’t Eat Dogs Animal Lovers Don’t Eat Animals Shirt

Normally a person like Coulter wouldn’t bother me so much, it’s like watching South Park – but she has actual power to sway elections, or at least she did in the last two. This means she had friends in high places of inflluence, and this scares me that we have now inflamed the world against us for some evangelical mission that was never Christ’s intention. And think about this: there’s a reason the womb is encased in the separate private body of an individual woman: it is between her and God, and her soul suffers the decision, as we are really spiritual beings and all the wars are within ourselves. We are just playing them out on a macro-scale. This is probably too metaphysical to understand but the key is inside us. Go rent WHAT THE BLEEP DO WE KNOW? The miracle in the water… And lastly, a good way to tell if you’re faith is working for you, is to ask yourself: “how has my life been made more loving by my faith?” If it isn’t making you a lighter, better, happier more generous person, then maybe we should try to see where we are clinging to the text in the wrong way. The key is hidden in plain sight. A great start is Emmet Fox “The Sermon on the Mount.” It liberated me! “Angles can fly because they take themselves lightly!”Love you all and God Bless you Ann Coulter!! Lydia COMMENT #151 [Permalink]… The Redneck said on 12/2/2005 @ 10:54 pm PT… Actually, we could go around and around and around on how democratic, peaceful, and desirous of ending war Lincoln was (lemme put it this way: all that evil stuff y’all accuse Bush of doing, Lincoln actually did), but even then there was a great difference between Democrats and Republicans. Meanwhile, my problem with abortion isn’t what a woman does with her body. It’s what a woman does with the kid’s body. “She does not appeal to nice people “in the middle” only to rapid extremists who are dangerous loons”You do realize that you’re trying to make the case that you just want us all to be nice to each other here, right? Granted, it’s not the type of insult that would have me calling for a lawyer, but it does kind of run counter to your purposes–an implication that we’re a brainless mob, ropes and shotguns in hand, waiting for Ms.

the people love dogwill not  Eat Dogs Animal Lovers Don’t Eat Animals by Shirt

Coulter to point a finger and scream doesn’t exactly promote love and understanding. I’m as willing to roll in the mud as anyone, or to take the high ground, but if you want to declare a truce, please do it before you throw the first punch. Also, out of curiosity, what did you have to say regarding Ward Churchill’s comments, regarding the “little Eichmanns” working in the World Trade Center when it was hit? Or Spike Lee’s commentary that someone should shoot Charlton Heston in the head, or Nina Totenburg’s hope that Jesse Helms–or one of his grandchildren–contracts AIDS? Would this be the time to speak of beams and motes? But here is the portion wherein I actually take offense:”but no one can mistake that my intentions are loving in that blog.”Yes, those intentions shine through, right… About… Here. Hate Ms. Coulter if you wish, ma’am. But please, don’t tell me about how you represent the loving side of Christianity, in the midst of a slander-and-smear piece. It’s… A little more than just ironic. “And did you ever stop to think that some of us artists and actors who have to play characters that are evil, have to delve deep within to feel a person’s emotions – therefore we see all sides and we develop compassion that is often lacking in math majors who don’t explore psyche for a living?”–I write myself, ma’am–perhaps not exceptionally, but well enough to win money both for short fiction, essay (a piece I’m rather proud of, seeing as I managed to use second person and present tense and actually managed to pull it off) and for poetry, and I have always been driven to white-hot hemorrhoidal rage by the concept of “I’m an artist, I feel things more than other people do.

Whe does Dog Lovers Don’t Eat meat Dogs Animal Lovers into Don’t Eat Animals with Shirt.

I usually have to bite down an urge to either a) put a cigarette out on their forehead and scream “That’d hurt like hell if someone did it to me, how does it feeeeeeel to you!?” or b) take off my shirt and drink bourbon from a quart jar. Fortunately, I succeed at a) and fail at b), rather than the other way around. Suffice to say that I firmly believe a greater ability to transfer what you feel to a medium–be it paper (both literally and electronically), canvas, sound, or the screen–does not therefore translate to a greater capacity to feel, or make someone a better person overall. COMMENT #152 [Permalink]… Proud Republican said on 12/2/2005 @ 11:24 pm PT… I feel more than all y’all, because I’ve been washed in the blood of the Lamb! Hallelujah!!! And remember: every sperm is sacred. COMMENT #153 [Permalink]… Big k said on 12/3/2005 @ 2:26 am PT… Ms Cornell, I must say, your attempts at an apology are nice in and of themselves and for that they are accepted. Please, in the future refrain from questioning the faith of those you disagree with. Honestly, you lost me right there. I can have a debate with anyone willing to talk rationally, even if I get infuriated with them. But questioning my faith is something you cannot do as a Christian. It is simply not Christ-like, and though I am glad you are reading your Bible, if you missed that part, you should read it again. To get more to the point at hand, yes, Jesus spoke against the Pharisees plenty of times. Because they were hypocrites. They were waiting for the Messiah to come, and here He was, but they were hoping to hit the reset button and see what else they could get. Again, not the �peacemaker� they were looking for, so he told them in no uncertain terms that their whole way of life would be destroyed (which it was), they would be scattered to the four winds (which they were), and they would lose their inheritance from Abraham (which is why we are Christians, not Jews). All showing he was not there to fix their temporal problems with the occupying force that took over their land. It could be argued that Jesus was �liberal� enough to tell everyone they can achieve Heaven and that perfection of the individual is possible no matter how much they have fallen before they die. Liberal in this sense being stretched to mean He was an eternal optimist. But make no mistake, He had no tolerance for willful ignorance. Accepting abortion in any terms amounts to this. Sorry. You are wrong.

 

Visit our Social Network: Pinterest, Blogger, and see more at our collection.